Grace Fellowship of South Forsyth

Spreading the fame of God by making disciples of Jesus Christ.

  • Explore
    • What We Believe
    • Leadership & Staff
    • About Worship
    • Common Questions
  • Events
  • Ministries
    • Benevolence
    • Bible Study
    • Children
    • Community Groups
    • Men
    • Missions
      • Annie Armstrong Offering
      • Colombia
      • Nigeria
      • Operation Christmas Child
    • Students
    • Women
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • GraceTALK
    • RightNow Media
    • Sermons Online
    • Shop Amazon
    • Spiritual Gifts Test
    • Stories of Grace
    • Study Tools & Resources
    • Weekly Memory Verses
  • Contact
  • Give

Review of the best seller, “The Shack”

Tuesday, June 15, 2010 by Dan Miller 11 Comments

Tim Challies overviews a review of the best selling book, The Shack.

In the book, Burning Down The Shack, James De Young gives a startling revelation regarding the theological moorings of Paul Young, author of The Shack.

In April of 2004 De Young attended a Christian think tank and there Young presented a 103-page paper which presented a defense of universal reconciliation, a Christian form of universalism—the view that at some point every person will come to a right relationship with God. If they do not do this before they die, God will use the fires of hell to purge away any unbelief (notice the issue is not our personal sin but our unbelief). Eventually even Satan and his fallen angels will be purged of sin and all of creation will be fully and finally restored. This is to say that after death there is a second chance, and more than that, a complete inevitability, that all people will eventually repent and come to full relationship with God. De Young believes that Young’s belief in universal reconciliation is absolutely crucial to anyone who would truly wish to understand The Shack.

Read the whole article.

Spread His Fame:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Eternity, heaven, hell, Reconciliation, Salvation, The Shack, Universalism

Dan Miller

About Dan Miller

Pastor Dan was part of the core group that started Grace Fellowship in 2003. In addition, he spent almost 16 years as a student pastor before Grace Fellowship. Pastor Dan is our Sunday morning teaching-pastor, leads the staff, and provides oversight for our church's disciple-making environments. Dan married Vicki in 1993. Together, they enjoy their seven children – Benjamin (married to Courtney), David, Alexa, Zachary (married to Ginna), Nathan, Ana, and Autumn, along with one grandchild - Lucy.

Comments

  1. Jeffrey J. Stables says

    Tuesday, June 15, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    Sure, The Shack tends toward a flavor of universalism. But I still think it’s a good example of tackling the problem of evil emotionally and not coming totally unglued from Biblical bedrock.

    Reply
  2. Dan says

    Wednesday, June 16, 2010 at 1:01 pm

    Jeffrey, I agree to a point. How much emotional satisfaction should be acceptable when truth is being sacrificed in the process?

    Reply
  3. Jeffrey J. Stables says

    Wednesday, June 16, 2010 at 1:53 pm

    You see, I don’t think that Young necessarily sacrifices truth in The Shack. His emotional arguments smack of coming from a universalist perspective, but don’t actually teach or embrace universalism. While I’m not very comfortable with how close it gets sometimes, I am happy to see someone making rather successful emotional reasoning about the problem of evil without wholesale denying Christian truth.

    Reply
  4. Larry F. says

    Wednesday, June 16, 2010 at 10:54 pm

    The Shack is about more than just the “problem” of evil. Young uses the book to present a view of God and particularly the Trinity that cannot be reconciled with the scriptures. In The Shack Young has created a god of his own understanding and one cannot get much further from truth than that.

    Reply
  5. Rick Crompton says

    Wednesday, August 14, 2013 at 3:52 pm

    I admit to not having read this book. But I have heard/read quotes from it cited by a few
    critics. The author should not be commended for conceptualizing God in a way that completely misrepresents His nature as revealed in Scripture. No Christian should be recommending this work to others. It does not convey the truth. It is the work of one man’s imagination running amuck.

    Reply
    • Jane Romano says

      Saturday, November 30, 2013 at 11:53 pm

      I TOTALLY disagree!!! This book is a great novel and describes VERY WELL our Father’s nature! And it has helped “countless” people FINALLY enter into a real, true “relationship” (which is what HE has ALWAYS wanted….from the beginning!!! )

      Reply
  6. Dan MillerDan Miller says

    Monday, December 2, 2013 at 6:47 pm

    Jane, thanks for jumping into the discussion (albeit a little late). Just one question. Are you saying that the representations of each member of the Trinity represent the very “nature” of the Godhead? The picture of God as a matronly African American Woman (later turning into a pony-tailed grey-haired man), Jesus – a young middle aged man, and the Holy Spirit as a small eclectic woman of Asian descent.

    Reply
    • David Ennis says

      Thursday, December 5, 2013 at 11:57 pm

      Dan, there are plenty of other points in the book regarding the nature of God to address besides the literary device used for representing the Trinity. That’s like saying, “Are you saying an egg or pie represents the very nature of the God-head?!” whenever someone uses those illustrations to communicate something that can’t be completely comprehended.

      No, no one is saying God is a black lady, an egg yolk, or a piece of pie.

      Reply
      • Dan Miller says

        Friday, December 6, 2013 at 7:12 am

        I agree. I am simply beginning to ask questions to try and find the basis for asserting confidence that this book accurately models a Biblical view of the nature of God. If I had said, I have only one question and one issue with this book’a representation of the nature of God and then posed this issue, I would be open to the criticism of aiming at the wrong thing.

      • David Ennis says

        Friday, December 6, 2013 at 4:30 pm

        Then address the real issues instead of a literary device.

        “Did you like Chronicles of Narnia?
        No, Jesus is not a talking lion.”

        😛

  7. Dan Miller says

    Friday, December 6, 2013 at 5:40 pm

    Would rather ask my question and not bring another book into this … Had too much coffee today, eh?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What People Are Saying

  • Dan MillerDan on How to Bind the DevilAnge, how exactly does one bind the devil?
  • Ange on How to Bind the Devil*And OVER all the power of the enemy.
  • Ange on How to Bind the DevilSt. Luke 10:19 says: Behold, I give unto you power to tread on serpents and...
  • Rae on Dealing with a ScofferDear Ngbabe, You nailed it!! Narcissism seems closest to this. I feel for you and...
  • Rose on Bibbidi Bobbidi Boo“So, what do you think? Am I rationalizing sin, or is there a legitimate distinction...

Podcast Feeds

  • Subscribe with iTunes
  • Podcast Feed

Contact Information

2750 Ronald Reagan Boulevard
Cumming, Georgia 30041
(770) 325-3735
Driving Directions
[email protected]
More Contact Information

Service Information

Worship Service
Sundays, 9:30 am
More Information

Bible Study
Sundays, 10:50 am (For all ages.)
More Information

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Weekly Newsletter

Grace Fellowship of South Forsyth. All Rights Reserved. © 2007-2022. Metro Atlanta, Georgia USA. Login

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.